| Explanation of the Physics (20%) |
Clearly and concisely explains the physics that is being investigated in this poster. Motivates it’s importance and relevance. |
Clearly and concisely explains the physics that is being investigated in this poster. |
Describes the physics being investigated |
Incomplete and/or unfocused. |
Absent, no evidence |
| Explanation of the Model (30%) |
Clearly and concisely explains the models that is being investigated in this poster and how it relates to the physics. Describes assumptions and approximations that are being made in the model. |
Clearly and concisely explains the models that is being investigated in this poster. Describes assumptions and approximations that are being made in the model. |
Clearly and concisely explains the models that is being investigated in this poster. |
Explains what the symbols in the model mean. |
Absent, no evidence |
| Presentation of Results (20%) |
Clearly presents figures that demonstrate the results of the analytical and computational modeling conducted. Describes the figure in a concise way and relates it to the underlying physics. |
Clearly presents figures that demonstrate the results of the analytical and computational modeling conducted. Describes the figure in a concise way. |
Figures are presented that result from the modeling and are described in a concise way. |
There are figures resulting from the calculations. |
Absent, no evidence |
| Discussion of the Results (20%) |
The discussion describes the results in the context of the model and the physics. Limitations and signficances of the work are discussed. Future directions are described that follow from the work that has been completed. |
The discussion describes the results in the context of the model and the physics. Limitations and signficances of the work are discussed. |
The discussion describes the results in the context of the model and the physics. |
There is a discussion of the results. |
Absent, no evidence |
| Overall Presentation and Flow (10%) |
The poster hangs together and follows a logical flow. It’s easy to tell what was done and how it was done. The poster could be read easily without the presenter. |
The poster hangs together and follows a logical flow. It’s easy to tell what was done and how it was done. |
The poster hangs together and follows a logical flow. It’s not that easy to tell what was done and how it was done, but you can make sense of it. |
The poster is really hard to understand and not logically organized. |
Not applicable |